首页> 外文OA文献 >“Call for Prices”: Strategic Implications of Raising Consumers' Costs
【2h】

“Call for Prices”: Strategic Implications of Raising Consumers' Costs

机译:“价格呼唤”:提高消费者成本的战略意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many consumer durable retailers often do not advertise their prices and instead ask consumers to call them for prices. It is easy to see that this practice increases the consumers' cost of learning the prices of products they are considering, yet firms commonly use such practices. Not advertising prices may reduce the firm's advertising costs, but the strategic effects of doing so are not clear. Our objective is to examine the strategic effects of this practice. In particular, how does making price discovery more difficult for consumers affect competing retailers' price, service decisions, and profits? We develop a model in which a manufacturer sells its product through a high-service retailer and a low-service retailer. Consumers can purchase the retail service at the high-end retailer and purchase the product at the competing low-end retailer. Therefore, the high-end retailer faces a free-riding problem. A retailer first chooses its optimal service levels. Then, it chooses its optimal price levels. Finally, a retailer decides whether to advertise its prices. The model results in four structures: (1) both retailers advertise prices, (2) only the low-service retailer advertises price, (3) only the high-service retailer advertises price, and (4) neither retailer advertises price. We find that when a retailer does not advertise its price and makes price discovery more difficult for consumers, the competition between the retailers is less intense. However, the retailer is forced to charge a lower price. In addition, if the competing retailer does advertise its prices, then the competing retailer enjoys higher profit margins. We identify conditions under which each of the above four structures is an equilibrium and show that a low-service retailer not advertising its price is a more likely outcome than a high-service retailer doing so. We then solve the manufacturer's problem and find that there are several instances when a retailer's advertising decisions are different from what the manufacturer would want. We describe the nature of this channel coordination problem and identify some solutions.
机译:许多耐用消费品零售商通常不宣传其价格,而是要求消费者致电询问价格。显而易见,这种做法增加了消费者学习他们正在考虑的产品价格的成本,而企业通常都采用这种做法。广告价格不会降低公司的广告成本,但是这样做的战略效果尚不清楚。我们的目标是研究这种做法的战略效果。尤其是,使消费者更难以发现价格会如何影响竞争零售商的价格,服务决策和利润?我们开发了一种模型,其中制造商通过高服务零售商和低服务零售商出售产品。消费者可以在高端零售商处购买零售服务,并在竞争的低端零售商处购买产品。因此,高端零售商面临着搭便车的问题。零售商首先选择其最佳服务水平。然后,选择最佳价格水平。最后,零售商决定是否宣传其价格。该模型产生四个结构:(1)两家零售商都宣传价格,(2)仅低服务零售商宣传价格,(3)仅高服务零售商宣传价格,(4)两家零售商都不宣传价格。我们发现,当零售商不宣传其价格并使消费者难以发现价格时,零售商之间的竞争就不会那么激烈。但是,零售商被迫收取较低的价格。另外,如果竞争零售商确实宣传其价格,那么竞争零售商享有更高的利润率。我们确定了以上四个结构中的每个结构均处于平衡的条件,并表明不提供其价格的低服务零售商比高服务零售商更可能这样做。然后,我们解决了制造商的问题,发现在某些情况下零售商的广告决策与制造商的要求不同。我们描述了此渠道协调问题的性质,并确定了一些解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号